Lemon Law Attorney Digs Into Some of His Craziest Cases

Sometimes, the automotive industry can be a crazy place to navigate. For somebody who really doesn’t know what they’re doing, there’s a lot of money and time to be lost. Unfortunately, there can be this tendency for a lot of competitors in the industry to try as hard as they can to save their bottom line. At times, this can definitely come at the cost of the consumer which is never something that we want to see.

This time, we dive into that concept when we take a look at the world of lemon law. Basically, there is legislation that forces automakers to take back a car if it has been fixed a certain amount of times within a certain timeframe. In other words, if the machine that an automaker produces is a complete dud, they need to compensate the buyer to offset their struggle with the car.

Just how real is this, though, and how bad can it get?

To those on the outside looking in, lemon law might seem like something that’s hardly practiced and perhaps just an excuse for lawyers to sue.

On the contrary, though, Steve Lehto of Lehto’s Law would argue that not only is the legislation very necessary but lemons popping up is much more common than one might think and the situations can be kind of aggressive. In addition, this can be compounded by all of the people looking to save a buck in the industry.

Down in the video below, we get the full rundown from Lehto as he tells the story of some of the craziest lemon law situations he has been in over on the VINWiki YouTube channel. When push comes to shove, these things can tend to get rather messy and be dragged out over ridiculous time periods. It’s definitely not a situation that we would want to be involved in.